چالش‌های تعاملات شبکه‌ای بین تعاونی‌های صنعت و کشاورزی استان زنجان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه جغرافیا، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران.

2 گروه جغرافیا، دانشکده علوم زمین، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.

3 گروه جغرافیا، دانشکده اجتماعی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران.

چکیده

تعاونی‌ها با ارتقای بهره‌وری و هم‌افزایی منابع، نقشی اساسی در توسعه همه‌جانبه کشورها ایفا می‌کنند. با وجود ظرفیت‌های گسترده کشاورزی و صنعتی در استان زنجان، تعاملات شبکه‌ای میان تعاونی‌ها کارآمد نیست و این موضوع موجب محدودیت در تأمین منابع، توسعه بازار و هم‌افزایی شده است. این پژوهش با هدف شناسایی چالش‌های تعاملات شبکه‌ای تعاونی‌های صنعت و کشاورزی استان و ارائه راهکارهایی برای تقویت همکاری و دستیابی به توسعه پایدار انجام شد. این پژوهش با رویکرد کیفی و استراتژی گراندد تئوری به‌منظور تبیین تعاملات شبکه‌ای تعاونی‌های صنعت و کشاورزی استان زنجان انجام شد. داده‌ها از طریق مطالعه کتابخانه‌ای و 25 مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختاریافته با نمونه‌گیری هدفمند گردآوری و تحلیل شد. یافته‌ها نشان داد نوسان‌های اقتصادی، کمبود سرمایه، ضعف اعتماد و سرمایه اجتماعی، پیچیدگی‌های اداری، کمبود هماهنگی مدیریتی و ناکارآمدی زیرساخت‌های فنی و محیط زیست، مانع بهره‌وری، تاب‌آوری و نوآوری شبکه‌ها هستند. مدل پارادایم پیشنهادی روابط میان شرایط علّی، زمینه‌ای، مداخله‌گر و کنش‌ها را با پیامدهایی همچون تقویت شبکه‌سازی و گسترش تعاونی‌ها ترسیم کرد و پنج قضیه نظری را برای تبیین موانع زنجیره تأمین ارائه داد. با وجود ظرفیت بالای تعاونی‌ها، محدودیت‌های شبکه‌ای سبب وابستگی به واردات و تضعیف بازارهای محلی شده است. تقویت نهادهای واسطه‌ای، آموزش مدیران و اعضا، سرمایه‌گذاری در زیرساخت‌ها و ترویج کشاورزی پایدار و انرژی تجدیدپذیر ازجمله راهکارهای پیشنهادی برای افزایش کارآمدی و توسعه پایدار استان است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Challenges of Network Interactions Between Industrial and Agricultural Cooperatives in Zanjan Province

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mehdi Cheraghi 1
  • Masumeh Mohammadloo 2
  • Siddiqa Mozafari Qarabolag 3
1 Department of Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran.
2 Department of Geography, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Department of Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Cooperatives play a pivotal role in comprehensive national development by enhancing productivity and enabling resource synergies. Despite the considerable agricultural and industrial potential of Zanjan Province, networked interactions among cooperatives remain weak, limiting resource mobilization, market expansion, and collaborative efficiency. This study aimed to identify the challenges hindering network interactions among agricultural and industrial cooperatives in the province and to propose strategies for strengthening cooperation and advancing sustainable development. Employing a qualitative approach and grounded theory methodology, the research analyzed data collected through a literature review and 25 semi‑structured interviews conducted using purposive sampling. The findings indicate that economic volatility, capital shortages, low levels of trust and social capital, administrative complexities, managerial incoherence, and inadequate technical and environmental infrastructures undermine the productivity, resilience, and innovativeness of cooperative networks. The proposed paradigm model illustrates the relationships among causal, contextual, and intervening conditions, the resulting actions, and outcomes such as enhanced networking and cooperative expansion. Additionally, five theoretical propositions were developed to explain supply chain constraints. Despite the significant potential of cooperatives, network limitations have increased dependence on imports and weakened local markets. Strengthening intermediary institutions, improving managerial and member training, investing in infrastructure, and promoting sustainable agriculture and renewable energy are recommended to enhance cooperative performance and support the province’s sustainable development trajectory.
 
 
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Cooperatives play a fundamental role in the comprehensive development of countries by enhancing productivity and resource synergy. Zanjan province, with 234 agricultural cooperatives and 155 industrial cooperatives, possesses significant potential for the formation of cooperative networks. However, network interactions between industrial and agricultural cooperatives in this province are inefficient, which has led to limitations in resource supply, market development, and synergy. The lack of sustainable linkages between these two sectors has reduced efficiency, innovation, and competitiveness, while increasing dependence on imports. Therefore, the present study was conducted with the aim of identifying the challenges of network interactions between industrial and agricultural cooperatives in Zanjan province and providing solutions to strengthen cooperation and achieve sustainable development.
Method
This research is qualitative in nature and applied in its purpose. To deeply explain network interactions, the grounded theory strategy was employed. This inductive, data-driven method, relying on systematic coding, generates a theory grounded in the data. Data were collected through two methods: 1) a library study including the review of books, scientific articles, reports, and statistical yearbooks to extract the background and theoretical foundations; and 2) conducting 25 semi-structured in-depth interviews with members of industrial and agricultural cooperatives in Zanjan province. Purposive sampling was employed, and the data collection process continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. To assess the validity (credibility) of the research instrument, face validity was used, and the interview protocol was reviewed and confirmed by experts. For reliability (dependability), the inter-rater agreement method was used, and an independent evaluator also coded the data; the convergence rate of the codes confirmed the reliability of the analysis.
Results
In the open coding stage, challenges were extracted into 17 main categories with varying frequencies. The most important challenges included: economic challenges (input price fluctuations with 100+ cases, high production costs, raw material supply problems, and lack of infrastructural investment), legal and political challenges (inefficiency of the General Department of Cooperatives with 16 cases, administrative complexities with 11 cases, and lack of supportive policies), social challenges (lack of trust between sectors with 10 cases, rural migration, and lack of representation in decision-making), technical and infrastructural challenges (lack of processing centers, water supply problems, and lack of storage facilities), market challenges (product marketing problems, lack of market needs recognition, and lack of proper branding), and environmental challenges (water resource shortages, renewable energy supply problems, and plant pests and diseases). In the secondary coding stage, these categories were integrated into more abstract concepts such as "financial problems," "economic fluctuations," "inadequate infrastructure," "lack of awareness and training," "legal complexities," and "weak management." Axial coding, using the paradigm model, explained the relationships among the conditions. Accordingly, causal conditions (including economic fluctuations, production costs, inadequate infrastructure, migration, social disputes, legal complexities, and market shortages) act as the main drivers of the problems. Contextual conditions (including social and support networks, educational centers, ownership and rights issues) and intervening conditions (including consultation and expertise, management and organization, information systems, and attention to local needs) also affect actions and interactions. Finally, actions such as marketing, customer attraction, and improving public services lead to outcomes such as networking of interactions, strengthening cooperatives, and expanding production cooperatives. In the selective coding stage, five theoretical propositions were presented that explain the most important supply chain barriers: 1- Inattention to market needs and insufficient knowledge of demand, 2- Defects in transportation and warehousing infrastructure, 3- Lack of financing and economic problems, 4- Existence of social disputes and lack of trust, and 5- Legal complexities and lack of supportive policies. The findings show that despite the high capacity of cooperatives, network constraints have caused dependence on imports and weakened local markets.
Conclusion
The present study showed that the challenges of network interactions between industrial and agricultural cooperatives in Zanjan province are multidimensional and include economic, social, legal, managerial, technical, and environmental factors. These challenges systematically reinforce each other and have reduced productivity, resilience, and innovation in cooperative networks. The paradigm model presented in this study provides a coherent theoretical framework for understanding the relationships among these factors. At the theoretical level, this research enriches the literature on sustainable development and cooperative economics by emphasizing the role of network interactions as a key mechanism for synergy between industry and agriculture. At the practical level, specific solutions are offered for policymakers and provincial managers: 1- Strengthening intermediary institutions to create horizontal and vertical coordination among cooperatives and facilitate the commercialization process, 2- Designing and implementing continuous training programs for cooperative managers and members focusing on digital skills, networking, and marketing to increase social capital and mutual trust, 3- Providing financial incentives including subsidies and low-interest loans and targeted investment in transportation, warehousing, and processing infrastructure to reduce economic fluctuations and production costs, 4- Promoting organic agriculture and the use of renewable energy to reduce adverse environmental impacts and increase sustainability, 5- Reforming complex administrative processes and creating transparency in laws to reduce confusion and increase investment incentives. Implementing these solutions can lead to the formation of sustainable supply chains, reduced dependence on imports, strengthened local markets, and ultimately the realization of sustainable development in Zanjan province. Future research can adopt a quantitative approach and test the model presented in this study, contributing to greater validation and generalizability of the results. Furthermore, conducting comparative studies among different provinces of the country can provide the basis for formulating more effective and localized policies.
Funding
There is no funding support.
Authors’ Contribution
The authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Cooperatives
  • Economic Links
  • Networking
  • Supply Chain
  • Sustainable Development
Ai, Y., Sun, G., & Kong, T. (2023). Digital finance and stock price crash risk. International Review of Economics & Finance, 88, 607–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.07.003
Bai, M., Li, Y., & Yu, C. F. J. (2025). Business environment trustworthiness and employee income share. International Review of Financial Analysis, 103, Article 104201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104201
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Behbahaninia, P. S., & Asgari, N. (2021). Social responsibility, corporate governance and lack of financial reporting transparency in Tehran Stock Exchange. Empirical Research in Accounting, 11(4), 55–76. (In Persian). https://jera.alzahra.ac.ir/article_5874.html?lang=en
Bolognesi, E., Burchi, A., Goodell, J. W., & Paltrinieri, A. (2025). Stakeholders and regulatory pressure on ESG disclosure. International Review of Financial Analysis, 103, Article 104145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104145
Capelle-Blancard, G., & Petit, A. (2019). Every little helps? ESG news and stock market reaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(2), 543–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3667-3
Cen, T. (2023). Green finance reform and stock price crash risk: Evidence from Chinese heavily polluting companies. Finance Research Letters, 56, Article 104133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104133
Chen, J., Chan, K. C., Dong, W., & Zhang, F. (2017). Internal control and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China. European Accounting Review, 26(1), 125–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2015.1117008
de Freitas Netto, S. V., Sobral, M. F., Ribeiro, A. R. B., & Soares, G. R. L. (2020). Concepts and forms of greenwashing: A systematic review. Environmental Sciences Europe, 32(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-0300-3
Dimson, E. (1979). Risk measurement when shares are subject to infrequent trading. Journal of Financial Economics, 7(2), 197–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(79)90013-8
Dyck, A., Lins, K. V., Roth, L., & Wagner, H. F. (2019). Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? Journal of Financial Economics, 131(3), 693–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.08.013
Fiechter, P., Hitz, J.-M., & Lehmann, N. (2022). Real effects of a widespread CSR reporting mandate. Journal of Accounting Research, 60(4), 1499–1549. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12424
Flammer, C. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 758–781. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0744
Flammer, C. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? Management Science, 61(11), 2549–2568. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2038
Freeman, R. E., & McVea, J. F. (2005). A stakeholder approach to strategic management. In The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management (pp. 189–207). پ
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Havlinova, A., & Kukacka, J. (2023). Corporate social responsibility and stock prices after the financial crisis: The role of strategic CSR activities. Journal of Business Ethics, 182(1), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04935-9
Heydari Rostami, K., Nikzad Ghadikolaei, M., & Khalili, Y. (2025). The women’s flourish in the board of directors and the company's sustainability performance. Journal of Sustainable Human Resource Management, 7(12), 161–147. (In Persian). https://shrm.journals.umz.ac.ir/article_5230.html?lang=en
Hoseinzade, A., Mousavi Shiri, M., Hajiha, Z., & Nikoomaram, H. (2023). Assessing convergence and divergence between accounting information quality criteria: Stakeholder management theory test. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 12(46), 141–154. (In Persian). https://www.jmaak.ir/article_21537.html?lang=en
Hu, D., Fang, X., & DiGiovanni, Y. M. (2023). Technological progress, financial constraints, and digital financial inclusion. Small Business Economics, 61(4), 1693–1721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00745-7
Hur, W.-M., Kim, H., & Woo, J. (2014). How CSR leads to corporate brand equity: Mediating mechanisms of corporate brand credibility and reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1910-0
Hutton, A. P., Marcus, A. J., & Tehranian, H. (2009). Opaque financial reports, R2, and crash risk. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.003
Jin, L., & Myers, S. C. (2006). R-squared around the world: New theory and new tests. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(2), 257–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.11.003
Jones, D. A., Willness, C. R., & Madey, S. (2013). Why are job seekers attracted by corporate social performance? Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0848   
Khalili, Y., Maleki Oskouei, M., Kabiri, M. T., & Heydari Rostami, K. (2024). The analysis of the application of social responsibility reporting in the timeliness of audit report. Auditing Knowledge, 24(96), 255–273. (In Persian).
Khalilian, B. (2023). Lack of financial reporting transparency, audit quality, risk of stock fall. Financial and Banking Strategic Studies, 1(2), 93–105. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22105/fbs.2023.178953
Kim, Y., Li, H., & Li, S. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 43, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.02.013
Kim, Y., Park, M. S., & Wier, B. (2012). Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility? The Accounting Review, 87(3), 761–796. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-1
Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. The Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785–1824. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12505
Quaye, J. N. A., Halsall, J. P., Winful, E. C., Snowden, M., Opuni, F. F., Hyams-Ssekasi, D., Afriyie, E. O., Opoku-Asante, K., Ocloo, E. C., & Fairhurst, B. (2024). Social enterprises and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A means to an end. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05359-x
Saeidi, S. P., Sofian, S., Saeidi, P., Saeidi, S. P., & Saaeidi, S. A. (2015). How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.06.024
Torelli, R., Balluchi, F., & Lazzini, A. (2020). Greenwashing and environmental communication: Effects on stakeholders' perceptions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), 407–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2373